Publications

Le premier d'une série de mises à jour hebdomadaires sur l'écosystème de l'information pendant la campagne électorale québécoise de 2026. Cette édition examine comment la guerre commerciale entre le Canada et les États-Unis est devenue l'enjeu dominant de la campagne — et comment certains acteurs en ligne s'en sont servis pour remettre en question l'intégrité de l'élection — ainsi qu'un sondage sur la confiance des Québécois envers les négociations, et un survol des vidéos de chefs générées par l'IA, des débats sur la neutralité des sondages et des critiques de la Boussole électorale.

Une étude nationale analysant plus de 8,8 millions de publications sur les médias sociaux et un sondage représentatif à l'échelle nationale afin d'évaluer si l'écosystème médiatique numérique du Canada est indépendant de l'influence américaine, révélant que cette indépendance varie selon les sujets et le temps — les Canadiens dominent la conversation lorsqu'une nouvelle nationale survient, mais un sous-groupe d'influenceurs canadiens est étroitement intégré à leurs homologues américains.

À l'approche de l'élection générale québécoise du 5 octobre 2026, ce rapport dresse un portrait de référence de l'écosystème informationnel québécois. Plusieurs facteurs rendent le contexte particulier : le référendum albertain sur la sécession, la guerre commerciale et les élections américaines de mi-mandat, le blocage des contenus journalistiques sur Facebook et Instagram, et la popularisation de l'IA générative, qui facilite la fabrication de contenus trompeurs. Ce rapport vise à mieux comprendre les types d’informations auxquels les électeurs et électrices seront exposés durant la campagne et les perceptions qu’ils entretiennent déjà à l’égard des institutions et de leur environnement d’information. Il traite notamment des tendances de consommation médiatique, de la confiance envers les institutions et l’environnement d’information, et de l'activité des candidats, médias et du commentariat politique sur les différentes plateformes de réseaux sociaux. Il compte également une synthèse des menaces et vulnérabilités.

The online response to the June 2026 shooting in the Côte-des-Neiges neighbourhood of Montreal, which left three people dead, illustrates how information circulates during and after a crisis. As with many tragic events, footage, claims, and speculation began spreading across platforms within minutes. In this incident report, we examine how information moved through the online environment during the incident, in its immediate aftermath, and over the following days — and through that, how breaking news and public safety information reach and are interpreted by the Canadian public.

The Canadian news environment is being reshaped by platform decisions, shifting audience habits, and the rise of new voices in political information. This brief examines how Canadians consume news and define journalism, drawing on a national survey of 1,518 respondents and analysis of nearly 9 million social media posts from Canadian news organizations across multiple platforms during 2023-2025.

A technical audit of four widely-used AI chatbots (Google Gemini, Anthropic Claude, Meta AI, and OpenAI ChatGPT), testing their responses to harmful requests. The audit found significant variation in safety measures across products, with roughly one in three tests across all four resulting in harmful content generation. Conducted in relation to Canada's Safe Social Media Act (Bill C-34).

A policy memo accompanying the Online Harms AI Audit technical brief, outlining recommendations arising from testing four widely-used AI chatbots for safety against harmful requests, in the context of Canada's Safe Social Media Act (Bill C-34).

A coordinated network of 340 Facebook pages, primarily operated from Vietnam, distributes AI-fabricated news stories targeting users in Canada, the US, the UK, and Europe. The network generates engagement through false narratives about politics, celebrities, and sports, driving traffic to fabricated-news websites monetized via advertising. Canadian public and private organizations inadvertently fund this operation through legitimate ad campaigns.

Scholars have suggested that we are experiencing a global crisis in trust in elections, with political polarization and misinformation often cited as reasons for distrust. However, empirical evaluations of perceptions of election integrity over time remain scarce. Using data from the Canadian Election Study from 2008 to 2021 and the Media Ecosystem Observatory from 2021, we show that trust in electoral management bodies, measured in terms of confidence, satisfaction, and fairness, has significantly declined since 2019 among Canadians with a right-wing ideology or who support right-wing parties. We find evidence that rising affective polarization, right-wing and social media consumption, and belief in US-based election fraud narratives are associated with significant trust declines in electoral integrity. The results identify key factors linked to the recent politicization of citizens’ perceptions of election fairness and have important implications for the health of our democracy.

A national survey of 1,306 Canadians found strong backing for platform accountability measures, including age-appropriate design requirements (84%), stronger legal accountability (82%), and an independent regulator with enforcement powers (72%). Canadians prefer design modifications over outright bans and support equivalent protections for AI chatbot services.

An examination of seven age verification methods recognized under the UK's Online Safety Act and their applicability to Canada. The analysis concludes that age verification is technically achievable and already deployed at scale, but that its effectiveness depends on broader governance structures rather than technology alone. Facial age estimation is found most viable for under-16 restrictions, though robust privacy protections and independent oversight remain essential.

A commentary on the redrafted Online Harms Act (now the Digital Safety Act), drawing on submissions to the AI Task Force and the Expert Panel on Online Safety. It sets out four design choices to watch in the new bill: amend rather than rewrite the C-63 architecture; pause rather than ban under-16 access; include consumer-facing chatbots with bespoke obligations; and build an independent, technically capable regulator.